pearsons test Search Results


90
GraphPad Software Inc d’agostino and pearson omnibus normality test prism 5.02
D’agostino And Pearson Omnibus Normality Test Prism 5.02, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pm24420365-81-7-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d’agostino and pearson omnibus normality test prism 5.02 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc d’agostino–pearson omnibus test
D’agostino–Pearson Omnibus Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc06687516-110-11-29?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d’agostino–pearson omnibus test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc d'agostino & pearson test
D'agostino & Pearson Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc10091778-239-13-18?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d'agostino & pearson test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments pearson chi-squared test
Univariate analysis of C2 E318D genotype with in-hospital mortality. : Individuals with the GA genotype appeared to have a higher mortality rate than the GG genotype category. The p-value for this using <t> Pearson's </t> chi-square test was 0.05. The AA genotype was excluded from the analysis because only a single individual had this genotype
Pearson Chi Squared Test, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc02697907-137-19-20?v=CH+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson chi-squared test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson correlation test
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Pearson Correlation Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc03362249-148-35-54?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson correlation test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson 2-tailed linear regression
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Pearson 2 Tailed Linear Regression, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/10__1074_slash_jbc__m112__422527-147-11-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson 2-tailed linear regression - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments chi-square test of pearson 2
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Chi Square Test Of Pearson 2, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc08608912-195-8-5?v=CH+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square test of pearson 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments chisquare test of independence
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Chisquare Test Of Independence, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pm31699133-97-4-22?v=CH+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chisquare test of independence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments pearson chi-square association test
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Pearson Chi Square Association Test, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc08225323-167-21-22?v=CH+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson chi-square association test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments pearson's chi-square test and exact test
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Pearson's Chi Square Test And Exact Test, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/pmc04162009-51-12-13?v=CH+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson's chi-square test and exact test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute pearson correlation test
Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, <t>Pearson</t> correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.
Pearson Correlation Test, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pearsons+test/10__3382_slash_japr__2011___00496-51-12-16?v=SAS+institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson correlation test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Univariate analysis of C2 E318D genotype with in-hospital mortality. : Individuals with the GA genotype appeared to have a higher mortality rate than the GG genotype category. The p-value for this using  Pearson's  chi-square test was 0.05. The AA genotype was excluded from the analysis because only a single individual had this genotype

Journal:

Article Title: Genetic Variation in Complement Component 2 of the Classical Complement Pathway is Associated with Increased Mortality and Infection: A Study of 627 Trauma Patients

doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819ea61a

Figure Lengend Snippet: Univariate analysis of C2 E318D genotype with in-hospital mortality. : Individuals with the GA genotype appeared to have a higher mortality rate than the GG genotype category. The p-value for this using Pearson's chi-square test was 0.05. The AA genotype was excluded from the analysis because only a single individual had this genotype

Article Snippet: C2 E318D single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype frequencies and other categorical variables were compared between outcome categories using the Pearson chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test.

Techniques:

Univariate analysis of C2 E318D genotype with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Individuals with the GA genotype appeared to have a higher VAP rate than the GG genotype category. The p-value for this using  Pearson's  chi-square test was 0.06. The AA genotype was excluded from the analysis because only a single individual had this genotype.

Journal:

Article Title: Genetic Variation in Complement Component 2 of the Classical Complement Pathway is Associated with Increased Mortality and Infection: A Study of 627 Trauma Patients

doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819ea61a

Figure Lengend Snippet: Univariate analysis of C2 E318D genotype with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Individuals with the GA genotype appeared to have a higher VAP rate than the GG genotype category. The p-value for this using Pearson's chi-square test was 0.06. The AA genotype was excluded from the analysis because only a single individual had this genotype.

Article Snippet: C2 E318D single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype frequencies and other categorical variables were compared between outcome categories using the Pearson chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test.

Techniques:

Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.

Journal: Journal of Neurophysiology

Article Title: Determinants of synaptic strength vary across an axon arbor

doi: 10.1152/jn.00615.2011

Figure Lengend Snippet: Presynaptic heterogeneity is correlated with the amount of postsynaptic NMDA receptors and PSD-95. Local axon segments were stimulated with 70 pulses delivered at 20 Hz to measure evoked release, followed by NH4Cl saline perfusion to measure total vesicle pool sizes. Post hoc immunostaining was performed with PSD-95, NR1, GluR1, or MAP2 antibodies to reveal postsynaptic specializations or dendrites. We examined 6–8 neurons for each marker. A: representative images of evoked ΔF (1st panel), total vesicle pool size (2nd panel), post hoc immunostaining of NR1 clusters (3rd panel; green channel is pHluorin, red channel is NR1), and colocalized pixels between NR1 and synaptophysin-pHluorin (4th panel). Arrowheads indicate the terminals plotted in B and C. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: correlation plot of total vesicle pool size and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (correlation coefficient r = 0.98, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.02). C: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and evoked ΔF of terminals shown in A (r = 0.99, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.006). D: correlation plot of NR1 intensity and total vesicle pool size of terminals shown in A (r = 0.97, Pearson correlation test, P = 0.03). E: the average correlation coefficient between evoked release and NR1 (9 segments; r = 0.8 ± 0.04) or PSD-95 (11 segments; r = 0.80 ± 0.04) was significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.003; PSD-95, *P = 0.003) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.6 ± 0.1, P = 0.27). Evoked release was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 7/8 axon segments measured (r = 0.4 ± 0.1). F: the average correlation coefficients between total vesicle pool size and NR1 (r = 0.8 ± 0.03) or PSD-95 (r = 0.80 ± 0.04) were significantly different from the MAP2 correlation coefficient (Mann-Whitney U-test: NR1, *P = 0.008; PSD-95, *P = 0.01) but not that of GluR1 (r = 0.7 ± 0.1, P = 0.17). Total vesicle pool size was not significantly correlated with the amount of MAP2 for terminals in 6/8 segments measured (r = 0.5 ± 0.1). G: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals colocalized with PSD-95 increased significantly from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.02). H: cumulative distribution of total vesicle pool size in presynaptic terminals not colocalized with PSD-95 was not significantly different from 10 to 21 DIV (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.13). Cc, correlation coefficient.

Article Snippet: Student's t -test was used for parametrically distributed values; the Mann-Whitney U -test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used for nonparametrically distributed values; the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test was used for multiple group data comparison; the Pearson correlation test was used to compare correlated values; and the F -test was used to compare linear regressions (GraphPad Prism).

Techniques: Saline, Immunostaining, Marker, MANN-WHITNEY

Spatial distribution of evoked release and total vesicle pool size across single axon arbors. A: Neurolucida tracing of a neuron transfected with synaptophysin-pHluorin and mCherry (not shown) to enable long-distance axon tracking. Colors indicate axon segments that were stimulated and imaged. Images taken after stimulation show the distribution of releasing presynaptic terminals (arrows). Scale bar, 100 μm. B: evoked release of individual presynaptic terminals, color coded by segment. C: the average random pair ratios of evoked release for terminals in color-coded axon segments shown in A (range: 2.9 ± 0.5 to 4.4 ± 0.5; average of all 5 segments from this neuron, white bar), as well as 22/24 axon segments from 6 neurons (average of terminals in all segments: 3.4 ± 0.2), are significantly higher than that for the two-repeats control (indicated by dashed line, 1.9 ± 0.2; Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.05). The random pair ratios of evoked release for terminals in color-coded segments and all segments from all axons are not significantly different (1-way ANOVA, P = 0.66). D: total vesicle pool size of individual presynaptic terminals, color coded by segment. E: the average random pair ratios of total vesicle pool size for terminals in short axon segments shown in A (range: 3.3 ± 0.6 to 5.0 ± 0.9; average of all 5 segments from this neuron, white bar), as well as 18/24 axon segments from 6 neurons (average of terminals in all segments: 3.2 ± 0.2), are significantly higher than the two-repeats control (indicated by dashed line, 1.9 ± 0.1; Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.05). The random pair ratios of total vesicle pool size for terminals in color-coded segments and all segments from all axons are not significantly different (1-way ANOVA, P = 0.92). F: relationship between coefficient of variance (CV) of evoked release and total vesicle pool size of presynaptic terminals from the most proximal (white circles; r = 0.65, Pearson correlation test, P < 0.05) and the most distal segments (black circles; r = 0.82; Pearson correlation test, P < 0.05) from 13 neurons (slope = 0.96 ± 0.05; Pearson correlation test, P < 0.0001).

Journal: Journal of Neurophysiology

Article Title: Determinants of synaptic strength vary across an axon arbor

doi: 10.1152/jn.00615.2011

Figure Lengend Snippet: Spatial distribution of evoked release and total vesicle pool size across single axon arbors. A: Neurolucida tracing of a neuron transfected with synaptophysin-pHluorin and mCherry (not shown) to enable long-distance axon tracking. Colors indicate axon segments that were stimulated and imaged. Images taken after stimulation show the distribution of releasing presynaptic terminals (arrows). Scale bar, 100 μm. B: evoked release of individual presynaptic terminals, color coded by segment. C: the average random pair ratios of evoked release for terminals in color-coded axon segments shown in A (range: 2.9 ± 0.5 to 4.4 ± 0.5; average of all 5 segments from this neuron, white bar), as well as 22/24 axon segments from 6 neurons (average of terminals in all segments: 3.4 ± 0.2), are significantly higher than that for the two-repeats control (indicated by dashed line, 1.9 ± 0.2; Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.05). The random pair ratios of evoked release for terminals in color-coded segments and all segments from all axons are not significantly different (1-way ANOVA, P = 0.66). D: total vesicle pool size of individual presynaptic terminals, color coded by segment. E: the average random pair ratios of total vesicle pool size for terminals in short axon segments shown in A (range: 3.3 ± 0.6 to 5.0 ± 0.9; average of all 5 segments from this neuron, white bar), as well as 18/24 axon segments from 6 neurons (average of terminals in all segments: 3.2 ± 0.2), are significantly higher than the two-repeats control (indicated by dashed line, 1.9 ± 0.1; Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.05). The random pair ratios of total vesicle pool size for terminals in color-coded segments and all segments from all axons are not significantly different (1-way ANOVA, P = 0.92). F: relationship between coefficient of variance (CV) of evoked release and total vesicle pool size of presynaptic terminals from the most proximal (white circles; r = 0.65, Pearson correlation test, P < 0.05) and the most distal segments (black circles; r = 0.82; Pearson correlation test, P < 0.05) from 13 neurons (slope = 0.96 ± 0.05; Pearson correlation test, P < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: Student's t -test was used for parametrically distributed values; the Mann-Whitney U -test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used for nonparametrically distributed values; the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test was used for multiple group data comparison; the Pearson correlation test was used to compare correlated values; and the F -test was used to compare linear regressions (GraphPad Prism).

Techniques: Transfection, Control, MANN-WHITNEY

Evoked release and release fraction are higher in distal compared with proximal segments of individual axon arbors. A: average evoked release in proximal axon segments (black symbols; 1.3 ± 0.2 × 104 AFU) is slightly but significantly smaller than distal segments (1.9 ± 0.3 × 104 AFU; 16 neurons; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P < 0.001). The average evoked release in proximal compared with distal segments is indicated by red symbols. B: average total vesicle pool size in proximal axon segments (black symbols; 15.2 ± 3.9 × 104 AFU) of individual neurons is not significantly different from that in distal segments (10.1 ± 2.0 × 104 AFU; 16 neurons; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P = 0.17). The average of total vesicle pool size in proximal compared with distal segments is indicated by red symbols. C: average release fraction in proximal axon segments (black symbols; 0.15 ± 0.02) is significantly smaller than that in distal segments (0.30 ± 0.04; 16 neurons; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P = 0.003). The average release fraction of proximal compared with distal segments is indicated by red symbols. D: relationship between evoked release and total vesicle pool size of presynaptic terminals from axon segments I-V from the representative neuron shown and color coded in Fig. 3A. Correlation coefficient and Pearson correlation test results for each segment: segment I, r = 0.67, P = 0.15; segment II, r = 0.86, P = 0.006; segment III, r = 0.81, P = 0.002; segment IV, not available; segment V, r = 0.88, P = 0.004. In this example, as for all axons measured (24 segments, 6 neurons), some segments have a similar regression slope, indicative of similar release fraction (segments I and II, segments III and IV), whereas release fraction is significantly different among other segments (1-way ANOVA, P = 0.007). E: relationship between evoked release and total vesicle pool size of all terminals in the most proximal segments (gray) and the most distal segments (black) from 13 neurons (evoked release: r = 0.90, Spearman correlation test, P < 0.0001; total vesicle pool size: r = 0.85, Spearman correlation test, P < 0.0001). The linear regression lines are significantly different (average proximal slope = 0.05 ± 0.005, distal slope = 0.14 ± 0.009; F-test, P < 0.001), indicating that distal terminals have a significantly higher release fraction compared with proximal terminals.

Journal: Journal of Neurophysiology

Article Title: Determinants of synaptic strength vary across an axon arbor

doi: 10.1152/jn.00615.2011

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evoked release and release fraction are higher in distal compared with proximal segments of individual axon arbors. A: average evoked release in proximal axon segments (black symbols; 1.3 ± 0.2 × 104 AFU) is slightly but significantly smaller than distal segments (1.9 ± 0.3 × 104 AFU; 16 neurons; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P < 0.001). The average evoked release in proximal compared with distal segments is indicated by red symbols. B: average total vesicle pool size in proximal axon segments (black symbols; 15.2 ± 3.9 × 104 AFU) of individual neurons is not significantly different from that in distal segments (10.1 ± 2.0 × 104 AFU; 16 neurons; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P = 0.17). The average of total vesicle pool size in proximal compared with distal segments is indicated by red symbols. C: average release fraction in proximal axon segments (black symbols; 0.15 ± 0.02) is significantly smaller than that in distal segments (0.30 ± 0.04; 16 neurons; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P = 0.003). The average release fraction of proximal compared with distal segments is indicated by red symbols. D: relationship between evoked release and total vesicle pool size of presynaptic terminals from axon segments I-V from the representative neuron shown and color coded in Fig. 3A. Correlation coefficient and Pearson correlation test results for each segment: segment I, r = 0.67, P = 0.15; segment II, r = 0.86, P = 0.006; segment III, r = 0.81, P = 0.002; segment IV, not available; segment V, r = 0.88, P = 0.004. In this example, as for all axons measured (24 segments, 6 neurons), some segments have a similar regression slope, indicative of similar release fraction (segments I and II, segments III and IV), whereas release fraction is significantly different among other segments (1-way ANOVA, P = 0.007). E: relationship between evoked release and total vesicle pool size of all terminals in the most proximal segments (gray) and the most distal segments (black) from 13 neurons (evoked release: r = 0.90, Spearman correlation test, P < 0.0001; total vesicle pool size: r = 0.85, Spearman correlation test, P < 0.0001). The linear regression lines are significantly different (average proximal slope = 0.05 ± 0.005, distal slope = 0.14 ± 0.009; F-test, P < 0.001), indicating that distal terminals have a significantly higher release fraction compared with proximal terminals.

Article Snippet: Student's t -test was used for parametrically distributed values; the Mann-Whitney U -test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used for nonparametrically distributed values; the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test was used for multiple group data comparison; the Pearson correlation test was used to compare correlated values; and the F -test was used to compare linear regressions (GraphPad Prism).

Techniques: